2019-2020 AP Mini-Poster Grading Rubric

ApchemWiki | RecentChanges | Preferences

Showing revision 5
Difference (from revision 5 to current revision) (minor diff)

Removed: 2,41d1
Background Information

3 - Information was concise and clear in framing topic and provided sufficient chemistry underlying information for reader

2 - Information was concise and clear in framing topic but did not provide sufficient chemistry underlying information for reader (or visa versa).

1 - Information was not concise/clear in framing topic AND NOT provide sufficient chemistry underlying information for reader (or visa versa).

0 - Not done



Objective/Purpose and Conclusion

3 - Correctly written purpose and conclusion sufficiently answers purpose

2 - Correctly written purpose but conclusion does not sufficiently answers purpose or visa versa

1 - Incorrectly written purpose and conclusion does not sufficiently answer purpose

0 - not done


Procedure

2 - Correctly written (including complete sentences) and all steps were provided include any Prelab notes.

1 - Not all steps written and/or no Pre-lab notes

0 - Not completed


Data Table (Observations)

3 - Correct sig fig & qualitative observation, proper units used, and well formated table

2 - Correct sig fig & qualitative observations, not proper units used, and/or not well formated table

1 - Incorrect sig fig,

0 - no data table present


Calculations

3 - All work shown correctly including using correct values from data table, correct units on every number and cancelled correctly, 2 more sig fig than in answer for all calculated numbers, correct # of sig fig in answer, and all other requirement from "expected work handout.

2 - No more than 2 mistakes from above requirements.

1 - 3 mistakes from above requirements.

0 - More than 3 mistake from above requirements and/or not done



Questions / Problems

For calculation problems, same rules as above.

3 - For non-calculating problems, answers are in complete sentence and appear correct.

2 - For non-calculation problems, one answer is not in complete sentence and/or there is one missing answer.

1 - For non-calculation problems, two answers are not in complete sentence and/or there is two missing answers

0 - three or more answers not in complete sentence and/or there is three missing answers or not done.


Appearance / Format

2 - Well formated (can easily find information), no scratching out, and all information is available.

1 - Not well formated (can easily find information), a few scratching out, and/or not all information is available.

0 - not done


Added: 42a3,33
_____ Is the Poster Neat and Organized (2pts)



_____ Title and Author(s) (1pt)



_____ Short Abstract (Summary of Experiment) (2pts)



_____ Question clearly stated (1pt)



_____ Hypothesis clearly stated (1pt)



_____ Background Information define conditions and provides sufficient chemistry understanding (2pts)



_____ Variables described appropriately (1pt)



_____ Material listed (1pt)



_____ Procedures clearly described (2pts)



_____ Results are summarized in a short paragraph (in a clear and concise manner) (2pts)



_____ Results are displayed in a table and or graph (3 pts)



_____ Statistical tests are performed and described (if needed) (2pts)



_____ Discussion/conclusion (what do results mean?) (4 pts)



_____ Give real life application/issue that deals with concept (with appropriate explanation) (3pts).



_____ Literature cited (1pts)



_____ Total (out of 20-30 pts)


AP Chemistry Lab Min-Poster Report Grading Rubric

Background Information
3 - Information was concise and clear in framing topic and provided sufficient chemistry underlying information for reader
2 - Information was concise and clear in framing topic but did not provide sufficient chemistry underlying information for reader (or visa versa).
1 - Information was not concise/clear in framing topic AND NOT provide sufficient chemistry underlying information for reader (or visa versa).
0 - Not done

Objective/Purpose and Conclusion
3 - Correctly written purpose and conclusion sufficiently answers purpose
2 - Correctly written purpose but conclusion does not sufficiently answers purpose or visa versa
1 - Incorrectly written purpose and conclusion does not sufficiently answer purpose
0 - not done

Procedure
2 - Correctly written (including complete sentences) and all steps were provided include any Prelab notes.
1 - Not all steps written and/or no Pre-lab notes
0 - Not completed

Data Table (Observations)
3 - Correct sig fig & qualitative observation, proper units used, and well formated table
2 - Correct sig fig & qualitative observations, not proper units used, and/or not well formated table
1 - Incorrect sig fig,
0 - no data table present

Calculations
3 - All work shown correctly including using correct values from data table, correct units on every number and cancelled correctly, 2 more sig fig than in answer for all calculated numbers, correct # of sig fig in answer, and all other requirement from "expected work handout.
2 - No more than 2 mistakes from above requirements.
1 - 3 mistakes from above requirements.
0 - More than 3 mistake from above requirements and/or not done

Questions / Problems
For calculation problems, same rules as above.
3 - For non-calculating problems, answers are in complete sentence and appear correct.
2 - For non-calculation problems, one answer is not in complete sentence and/or there is one missing answer.
1 - For non-calculation problems, two answers are not in complete sentence and/or there is two missing answers
0 - three or more answers not in complete sentence and/or there is three missing answers or not done.

Appearance / Format
2 - Well formated (can easily find information), no scratching out, and all information is available.
1 - Not well formated (can easily find information), a few scratching out, and/or not all information is available.
0 - not done



ApchemWiki | RecentChanges | Preferences
Edit revision 5 of this page | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited November 12, 2019 10:41 am (diff)
Search: